Find your focus DoingResearch.net

Find your focus Narrow the Topic Until You Can Finish

Research a questionPhase 2 · Find your focus

Narrow the Topic Until You Can Finish

Most research projects that stall began too big. Umberto Eco's practical tests, and narrowing by time, place, group and source, turn a topic you could write about forever into one you can finish.

Type
Method
Tested
Updated
Read
7 min
Steps
6
Sources
5

Purpose

A broad topic feels safe. There’s plenty written about it, so you can’t run out of material. That is the problem. You can’t read it all, you can’t say anything about it that someone hasn’t said better, and you never reach the end.

Umberto Eco’s first rule of topic choice in How to Write a Thesis comes down to this: write the thesis you are actually able to write. He wrote for Italian students with limited time and money, and his tests for a topic are practical ones. It should connect to what you’ve already studied and done. Its sources should be ones you can physically get to and are allowed to use. You should be able to understand those sources. And its method should be one you have some experience with: if the topic means analyzing a piece of music, you need some music theory.

His summary of the whole chapter is that the more you narrow the field, the better and more safely you work. A narrow topic done with rigor is worth more than a grand one left half-done. This page is about how to narrow.

When you need it

  • You can describe your topic in two or three words (“social media,” “climate,” “the Renaissance”).

  • Every search returns thousands of results and you can’t tell which matter.

  • You’ve been reading for weeks and can’t see where the project ends.

  • The key sources are in a language you don’t read, an archive you can’t visit, or a method you haven’t learned.

  • You have a deadline, and the topic would fill a career.

How to do it

1Run Eco’s four tests

Write your topic down, then answer four questions honestly. Does it connect to what you already know? Can you physically reach the sources, and will you be allowed to use them? Can you understand them, in their language and at their level? Do you know, or can you learn in time, the method it needs? A “no” to any of these is a reason to narrow or shift the topic now, before you’ve invested months. Eco said he wouldn’t take on a topic unless he knew where the sources were, whether they were easy to get to, and whether he could fully understand them.

2Check the word count of your topic

The Craft of Research, by Wayne Booth, Gregory Colomb and Joseph Williams, offers a quick test: if your topic is only a few words long, it’s probably too broad. Narrow it by adding an action or a relationship. Their example turns “the history of commercial aviation” into the military’s role in developing one airliner, the DC-3, in the early years of commercial flight. The longer version tells you what to look for and what to leave out.

3Narrow along one line at a time

Most topics can be cut in a few standard directions. Try each and keep the cuts that make the sources easier to handle:

  • Time: a decade, a year, a season, one event.
  • Place: one country, one city, one institution, one archive.
  • Group: one population, profession, author or organization.
  • Source type: newspapers, court records, letters, survey data, one author’s published works.
  • Angle: one aspect of the topic, such as its economics, its law or how it was reported.

Eco’s own examples work this way. A study of the “world turned upside down” theme (fish that fly, birds that swim) across all medieval writers would mean reading every writer who ever used it, however obscure. He suggests narrowing it to the Carolingian poets: one group, one period.

4Turn a big idea into one thinker’s idea

If your topic is an abstract problem (freedom, justice, the nature of the mind), Eco’s advice is to anchor it in someone who has already worked on it. Instead of “the notion of freedom,” write about the notion of freedom in Kant. You still get to think about freedom, but with a foothold in existing scholarship and a body of texts you can actually finish reading. Your own ideas can go in the last chapter.

5Use a catalog’s subject headings to see the cuts

Library catalogs have already divided most subjects. Look up your topic in the Library of Congress Subject Headings at id.loc.gov and you’ll see narrower headings beneath it, other names for the same subject (useful search terms), and headings that combine the subject with a place or an aspect. Each narrower heading is a topic someone has found big enough to write a book about.

6Size it to your time

Eco gave his students a range: no longer than three years, no less than six months. For a six-month project he set three conditions: the topic is clearly defined, it is either recent or little written about (so the existing literature is small), and the sources are available locally. Shrink those numbers for a term paper. If you can’t list the sources you’ll read and roughly how long each will take, the topic isn’t narrow enough yet.

Try it

Your task

Start with the broad topic “Epidemics.” Use the Library of Congress Subject Headings at id.loc.gov to narrow it. Find out: (1) which narrower headings sit directly beneath “Epidemics,” and which one is tied to specific years; (2) what other names that time-bound heading goes by; (3) whether its record allows adding a place; and (4) one existing heading that narrows the same event to a single angle.

Show a hint

Search id.loc.gov for “Epidemics” and open the Library of Congress Subject Headings record with exactly that name. Look at its narrower terms, then open the one with dates in its name.

Show the answer and the path

The heading “Epidemics” (record sh85044370) lists these narrower terms: Black Death; Influenza Epidemic, 1918-1919; Pandemics; Syndemics; Plant diseases—Epidemics; and Fungal diseases of plants—Epidemics. The record may show more if catalogers add headings later.

The time-bound one is Influenza Epidemic, 1918-1919 (record sh2003011372). It narrows by disease and by years at once.

  • Its other names are Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919; Spanish Flu Epidemic, 1918-1919; and Spanish Influenza Epidemic, 1918-1919. Search with all of them: different writers use different names.
  • The record marks it as a heading that may be subdivided geographically, so catalogs can pair it with a country, state or city. That’s your place cut.
  • A separate heading, Influenza Epidemic, 1918-1919, in literature (sh2019102516), narrows the same event to one angle: how fiction and poetry dealt with it. Searching “Influenza Epidemic” on id.loc.gov finds it.

The path shows the narrowing in action: “Epidemics” (a library’s worth) becomes one epidemic (a shelf), then that epidemic in one place or one kind of writing (a few books and an archive). Add a source type, such as one city’s newspapers during the months the epidemic hit, and you have a topic you could finish in a term.

Common mistakes

  • Narrowing in name only. “The 1918 flu” is narrower than “epidemics,” but it’s still a library. Keep cutting until you can list your sources.

  • Choosing sources you can’t reach. A topic that depends on an archive across the ocean, a private collection, or records you need permission to see can stall for reasons that have nothing to do with you.

  • Picking a method you don’t have. A topic that needs statistics, a language or a lab skill you lack adds a second project to the first.

  • Fearing that narrow means trivial. Eco argues that a narrow topic handled rigorously can still be useful to others. Depth on a small subject beats a thin survey of a large one.

  • Narrowing before exploring. Cutting on day one, before you know the field, often cuts in the wrong place. Read broadly first, then narrow.

Limits

Narrowing too far is also possible. If you find almost nothing on your topic, check whether that’s because no one has written about it (an opening) or because the sources don’t exist (a dead end). A librarian can often tell you which.

Eco wrote about a humanities thesis built mostly from books. In lab sciences and many social sciences, a supervisor, a funder or an existing dataset often sets the topic, and narrowing means choosing which question within it you’ll take on.

Narrowing settles what you’ll study, not what you’ll ask about it. A narrow topic still needs a question: see Turn a Topic into a Question.

Sources & further reading

End of page · Back to top